The world’s leading engineer / access information publisher runs the numbers on Kirk Adams’s business case for inclusion, and checks whether a book about access is itself accessible.
📘 Get the Book: The Disability Dividend
Supercharge Your Bottom-Line Through Disability Inclusion, by Dr. Kirk Adams (2026).
Here’s what it’s about: Dr. Adams, blind since age five and a lifelong disability-employment leader, makes the data-backed case that hiring people with disabilities isn’t charity, it’s strategy, then hands business leaders a step-by-step playbook for capturing the return. 182 pages, six chapters, available now in hardcover, paperback, and a $1.99 Kindle edition.
👉 Get the Book on Amazon • Browse Kirk’s Amazon Author Page
TL;DR: Dr. Kirk Adams, former President and CEO of the American Foundation for the Blind, the first blind person to summit Mount Rainier, and one of our own Top Tech Tidbits editors, has written a book arguing that intentionally hiring people with disabilities is not charity but a measurable competitive advantage. It’s called The Disability Dividend: Supercharge Your Bottom-Line Through Disability Inclusion. I know Kirk. I distribute Kirk. So I didn’t simply endorse his book. I audited it. Here’s what the numbers, the systems, and my own back office had to say.
Our Story Begins With a Conflict of Interest
Let me get the disclosure out of the way first, because you deserve it before you read a single word of praise. Blake Steineke put Dr. Kirk Adams on my radar in May of 2024. By June 13, 2024, I was on Kirk’s Heart of Influence livestream alongside Sean Callagy and Bella Verita, talking about AI ethics, cane-tip durability, and why newsletters still beat the algorithmic feed. The on-air chemistry spilled offline, and it hasn’t stopped since.
Today, Kirk is an editor at Top Tech Tidbits. He is a current Access Information News sponsor. And he is a co-founder, with me, of the PWD Media Distribution Co-op. If you’re keeping score, that’s three separate reasons for me to hand you a glowing blurb and move on.
I’m not going to do that. That is exactly why I didn’t simply endorse this book. I audited it. A friendly reviewer owes you more scrutiny, not less. So I read all 182 pages as three people at once: the computer engineer who wants to see the math, the publisher who reaches tens of thousands of disabled professionals every week, and the guy whose entire company exists to make information accessible. Let’s take them in order.
The Thesis on Trial: Charity or Strategy?
Kirk’s argument is a single sentence, and he repeats it like a drumbeat: “Disability inclusion isn’t just the right thing to do, it’s a strategic advantage.” The promo distillation is even blunter: inclusion isn’t charity, it’s strategy.
He’s making that case at a genuinely hostile moment, and he says so plainly. The book is written against the 2025–2026 rollback of diversity programs, the dismantling of the Department of Education, and the roughly 78% of vocational-rehabilitation funding that hangs in the balance as a result. Kirk’s bet is that business should voluntarily fill the gap the government is vacating, and that the companies who do will win. This is not a political book. It’s a business book wearing work boots.
Which raises the only question an engineer ever really asks: does the claim survive contact with the data? “Dividend” is a promise of return on investment. If the numbers don’t back it, “dividend” is just a nice word on a nice cover. So I put the book on the bench and started pulling it apart.
Auditing the System: Four Stakeholders and a Return on Investment
The book rests on two load-bearing structures, and I tested both.
The first is a system. Kirk argues that disability employment fails because its four stakeholder groups, government, corporate, nonprofit, and community, operate in silos, each doing good work that never connects. His fix is to pull all four to the same table and co-create the solution. As someone who audits systems for a living, I went looking for the place where the architecture breaks. I mostly didn’t find it. His worked example, the Apex cybersecurity program he built with the firm Novacoast, wiring together state vocational-rehabilitation agencies, employers, nonprofits, and the organized blind community, is the loop actually closing in the real world, not a diagram on a whiteboard. The design holds.
The second structure is the ledger, and this is where a business book lives or dies. Kirk doesn’t flood you; he places his numbers carefully. A 2018 Accenture study found disability-inclusive companies posted, on average, 28% higher revenue and 30% higher economic profit over four years. Disability:IN‘s 2024 benchmark reports leaders realizing 1.6× the revenue and 2.6× the net income of their peers. Inclusive apprenticeships return $1.47 for every dollar invested. Employees with disabilities show turnover roughly half that of their non-disabled colleagues, and, the number that should stop every operations leader cold, 48% fewer safety incidents.
Now, the auditor’s obligation. While those datasets are genuinely impressive, they primarily represent correlation, and several draw from companies that were already inclusive, which invites a self-selection question the book doesn’t fully close. Kirk is honest about being an advocate, and an advocate’s ledger always deserves a skeptical read. But here’s what tipped me: even after you discount for study design, the direction never reverses. Every serious number points the same way. And the statistic underneath all of them isn’t in dispute at all, only about 35% of working-age people with significant disabilities are employed, versus roughly 75% of everyone else, while one in four American adults has a disability. Translation: there is an enormous, qualified, motivated talent pool sitting outside the funnel, and the book’s core claim clears the bar.
The Data Flaw Hiding in the Hiring Funnel
There’s one chapter where my day job lets me go deeper than a general reviewer can, and it’s the one on artificial intelligence.
Kirk treats AI as a double-edged sword: a spectacular accommodation tool on one edge, and on the other, a hiring gatekeeper that has been quietly screening disabled candidates out. He points to early hiring systems that penalized the employment gaps common on disabled applicants’ résumés, and to the AI Now Institute’s 2019 report, Disability, Bias, and AI. He’s right, and I want to sharpen why he’s right, because it matters.
This is not a machine being cruel. It’s a training-data flaw. A model trained on decades of biased hiring learns that exclusion and launders it back out as an “objective” score. The book’s own field research proves the bias predates the algorithm: a 2018 study that sent out 6,016 job applications found that disclosing a disability drew 26% fewer expressions of employer interest. The algorithm didn’t invent that. It just automates it at machine speed and scale. And the fear driving the whole thing, that accommodations are expensive risk, collapses against Kirk’s own figure that most accommodations cost less than $500. If I have a ding here, it’s that Kirk names this problem better than he prescribes how a company should actually audit its vendors’ models for it. But naming it, in a business book, in 2026, is more than most authors dare.
From My Vantage as a Publisher, the Pool Is Real
Here’s where I can add something Kirk’s data tables cannot. From my vantage point as a publisher, the “vast untapped talent pool” isn’t an abstraction. I mail it.
Between Top Tech Tidbits and Access Information News, I put accessible news in front of more than 89,000 blind, low-vision, deaf, hard-of-hearing, deafblind, neurodivergent, and otherwise disabled professionals every single week. When Kirk writes about capable people being overlooked, I don’t have to imagine them. They are on my subscriber list. And this past May we independently verified, through LinkedIn Matched Audiences, that 85% of the Access Information News list maps to active professional profiles, real job functions, real seniority, real employers. The pool has a mailing list, and I own a copy of it.
Kirk’s point about non-disclosure lands especially hard from that seat. Roughly 15% of any large workforce has a disability, and up to 96% of severe disabilities are non-apparent. Most employers already employ the very people they’re afraid to hire, they just don’t know it. And the market follows the workforce: 92% of customers report viewing disability-inclusive companies more favorably. A publisher who sells reach for a living understands that number in his bones. Inclusion doesn’t just widen your hiring funnel. It widens your customer base.
Does a Book About Access Actually Walk the Walk?
Now the test no mainstream reviewer will run, and the one Access Information News readers most want to see. If you write a book arguing that disability inclusion is strategy, your book had better be accessible. So I applied a simple three-part test.
The braille cover? Pass, there is actual braille embossed on the front, which means the book announces its thesis to a blind reader before anyone reads a word aloud. The ebook? Pass, the EPUB is clean and screen-reader-friendly. The audiobook? Incomplete, as of this writing it’s still only “planned,” alongside a companion course. Two of three. One clever caution worth flagging: the stylized dollar sign in “Di$ability” on the cover is sharp branding for sighted eyes, but stylized glyphs and text-to-speech engines don’t always get along, exactly the kind of detail a Voice-of-Access reviewer catches and a sighted one sails right past.
Inclusion isn’t charity. It’s strategy.
Two of three is a passing grade, and the missing piece is on the roadmap. For a disability-employment book, largely practicing what it preaches is rarer than it should be. The hardcover shipped June 23, the paperback July 8, and the Kindle edition launched at just $1.99. Kirk, if you’re reading this: finish the audiobook. Your own argument demands it.
I Ran My Own Shop Through Kirk’s Checklist
The book opens with a Disability Inclusion Self-Assessment, a plain yes/no diagnostic across policy, hiring, accessibility, training, culture, feedback, advocacy, and accountability. It would be cowardly to review that tool without taking it, so I sat down and ran Mind Vault Solutions through it, out loud.
Some questions were instant, confident yeses. Accessibility isn’t a program at my company; it is the product, we’ve built ADA, WCAG, and Section 508 compliance for blind and disabled clients for over fifteen years, and the readers at the center of our business are disabled professionals. But the tool also asks about the unglamorous scaffolding, a written, actively-used disability-inclusion policy; a documented, centralized accommodations process; disability metrics inside performance reviews, and I’ll be honest: for a small, fully-remote shop, I could not answer every one of those with a confident yes. That’s the point, and that’s the value. If the publisher of an accessibility newsletter finds gaps in his own house, yours has them too. A good checklist doesn’t flatter you; it surfaces the things you’d otherwise rationalize away. Kirk’s does exactly that, and then hands you a ten-step playbook for closing them.
The Verdict: The Dividend Clears the Audit
So, final report. The Disability Dividend does not prove that every figure generalizes to every firm. It does not prove the current political rollback won’t bite. It does not hand you a turnkey method for auditing an AI vendor. But it does tell you something important, and it earns it: the business case for disability inclusion survives an audit.
Kirk refuses the charity frame, and the ledger backs the refusal. As he writes in the closing pages, “We are not asking for favors. We are asking for fairness.” The moral case and the money case point in exactly the same direction, which is the most useful thing a business book can ever tell you.
My recommendation is simple, and it comes in three parts, the way I like them. One: read it, the $1.99 Kindle edition removes your last excuse. Two: take the self-assessment, honestly, for your own organization. Three: if you employ people, stop treating the disabled talent pool as a good deed and start treating it as a hiring pipeline. Or, in Kirk’s words, turn intention into implementation.
Some people write books about inclusion. A few actually put braille on the cover. Dr. Kirk Adams did both, and the numbers underneath earn the ink.
Interest Disclosure: As noted up top, Dr. Kirk Adams is a Top Tech Tidbits editor, a current Access Information News sponsor, and my co-founder in the PWD Media Distribution Co-op. Sponsors of Access Information News buy advertising placements; they do not and cannot buy editorial coverage. This review is independent editorial, one publisher’s honest audit, held to the same standard I’d apply to a book by a total stranger.
AI Disclosure: I, Aaron Di Blasi, a human being, read the book, formed the argument, made every judgment call and wrote every paragraph of this review myself. Claudia (Claude Code) helped me to pressure-test my arguments and organize the audit. I initiated the questions; she helped me to verify them. Team effort.
Cheers,
” The greatest barrier to accessibility is indifference. “
Aaron Di Blasi, PMP
Engineer, Educator, Advocate, Publisher & Journalist
President & Sr. PMP, Mind Vault Solutions, Ltd., PR Director: AT-Newswire, Publisher: AI-Weekly, Top Tech Tidbits, Access Information News, Title II Today
Mind Vault Solutions, Ltd.
President, Sr. Project Management Professional (2006 — Present)
Innovative ideas. Solutions that perform.
Top Tech Tidbits
Publisher (2020 — Present)
The Week’s News in Access Technology
Access Information News
Publisher (2022 — Present)
The Week’s News in Access Information
AI-Weekly
Publisher (2024 — Present)
The Week’s News in Artificial Intelligence
AT-Newswire.com
PR Director (2024 — Present)
Access Technology’s Digital Newswire
Title II Today
Publisher (2025 — Present)
The Month’s News in Title II Compliance
PWD Media Co-Op
Founder (2025 — Present)
Amplifying Disability Voices Through Collective Reach
Connect With Me:
🌍 Website: https://toptechtidbits.com/
📧 Email: publisher@toptechtidbits.com
📞 Phone: +1 (855) 578-6660
📧 Subscribe: https://toptechtidbits.com/subscribe/
💬 Facebook: https://toptechtidbits.com/facebook/
💬 LinkedIn: https://toptechtidbits.com/linkedin/
💬 Mastodon: https://toptechtidbits.com/mastodon/
🛜 RSS: https://toptechtidbits.com/feed/
💬 X (Formerly Twitter): https://toptechtidbits.com/x/
📽️ YouTube: https://toptechtidbits.com/youtube/
📍 Address: 1284 SOM Center Road, PMB 194, Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124-2048, USA